hugsql

2018-02-10T03:16:12.000036Z

sorry i meant identifiers: https://www.hugsql.org/#param-identifier

2018-02-10T03:30:34.000023Z

ah neat! thanks dunno how i missed that 😊

2018-02-10T03:39:46.000154Z

np. i had the same question. I think if you want to do lot of composing then you might want honey sql. my gut tells me there is nothing wrong with mixing the two libs/approaches

2018-02-10T03:40:05.000070Z

their pros and cons complement each other

2018-02-10T03:40:43.000095Z

hug is straight forward and the most direct path. Honey itches the scratch of being able to build sql queries programmatically.

2018-02-10T03:41:40.000076Z

datomic solves both issues in so far as i can tell.

2018-02-10T03:54:39.000090Z

i completely agree with you, hugsql makes me end up writing my won dsl -- in the cases where i want to make advantage of postgres's functoinaitly it's easier to use hugsql for that case

2018-02-10T03:54:52.000051Z

i'd love to use datomic 😊 haha, one day