sorry i meant identifiers: https://www.hugsql.org/#param-identifier
ah neat! thanks dunno how i missed that 😊
np. i had the same question. I think if you want to do lot of composing then you might want honey sql. my gut tells me there is nothing wrong with mixing the two libs/approaches
their pros and cons complement each other
hug is straight forward and the most direct path. Honey itches the scratch of being able to build sql queries programmatically.
datomic solves both issues in so far as i can tell.
i completely agree with you, hugsql makes me end up writing my won dsl -- in the cases where i want to make advantage of postgres's functoinaitly it's easier to use hugsql for that case
i'd love to use datomic 😊 haha, one day