new project: aacounters
will be used to demo aalog
Time to redo aalog. 'Cause I am not sure the goog.log is what I want. Looks like I just want aalog to be a dumb wrapper of console. --I'm NOT shooting for the moon here!
Once I have it working with js, I want to start on me databases again.
😄
reactji performance art inspire by la lune
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LaLune1867.jpg#/media/File:LaLune1867.jpg
I am happy with the very small progress made today. 'Cause it is all so new to me. But hopefully I can soon become productive again. New is fine, but nothing beats productive for the sheer joy of living. :simple_smile:
agreed - it will come
It is due.
Past due!
I need a break from all this.
😸
I want to crank some code!
I want to smoke some weed
That would not help my productivity.
😄
¯\(ツ)/¯
aen "what me worry!"
instead I got a pack of "roll yer own" american spirit organic
Alfred (mad magazine) was an early precursor to south park
love that mag
figured. 😄
you know me too well
how about OMNI magazine - big influence on me
We all love being predictable. What we don't like is when folk know when we are going to break pattern. We hate being predicted.
and drinking coffee with sinfire
Analog science fiction / science fact!
Big John W. Campbell fan here!
Read dune 25 times.
mythology at its best - wait -that's another Campbell
And it was serialized in Analog.
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
I love writing code indistinguishable from magic. But other devs just refuse to buy in.
it's all magick
So now I want to write code in a series of modules, where each one is simple and understandable. And the composition is deep magic.
I love clojure's bag of properties pattern!
--use it extensively
But what I want is airity checking (number of arguments) when invoking a function reference.
(x 1 2) where x is a variable or expression.
((;f1 bag) bag 1 2) is how I like things, but there are NO checks!
--instead of methods
(bag is a map)
bag is a map holding both data and functions.
ttfn. tired
brackets are better? [[:funFun bag] bag :apple "sam"]
And lets bring back camel case!
no, I hate camel case
dashes are much better, don't you agree
Unless you are providing a java interop!
Why not underscore then?
the _ - issues of clojure/java are really ugly.
true
Most of what I've done in clojure has been using the java interop. Which is why I have a worse-than-usual low opinion of the language. Very ad hoc and difficult to work with.
I've simplified aalog and gotten it working in aademo console. For the moment, it is residing in the console demo itself. Gotta fix that. :simple_smile:
coffee w/fireball for breakfast, yum
fireball?
@laforge49: fireball is cinnamon-flavored whiskey - yum!!!
for breakfast
Put it on your oatmeal? 😄
no, in my coffee
Then you can light it. Oh! Oatmeal flambe.
Was wondering if you had any interest in rewriting aalog.
It really needs to be implemented using macros. So the formatting overhead is not invoked unless it qualifies for the current logging level.
Of course, I'm only talking about the clj side.
I still haven't installed any developer tools on this borrowed laptop yet, and my speaker proposal for clojure/west is due by the 29th and I've got some other things going on so it wouldn't be until the end of the month
Actually, I'm thinking pancakes flambe would be more interesting.
There's no timeline on this.
yes, fireball on pancakes sounds good - maybe for breakfast tomorrow
tell me how it comes out!
I really think of aalog as a place holder. I'm quite surprised that no one has done a cljc logger yet!
I mean, it is a pain to use separate loggers when writing cljc.