@bhauman FWIW, while it would be much faster, we can’t have a directly-reducible version of tree-seq
. Details are in the last comment in https://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-2464
You can always define your own tree-seq'
as illustrated here: https://gist.github.com/mfikes/cc1d1fac47e7dc112b0b9f4e3de11eae
@mfikes coolio, thanks for the update