Good to see Pyroclast going for strong consistency instead of eventual
I recently saw their Clojure/West demo. Really a good one. At the back they are using Datomic and Dynamo DB. Both support strong consistency. Are you referring to the same level?
@anujsays I meant strong consistency as a design choice. Of course, DynamoDB’s offer in read consistency — eventual/strong is quite nice to have. Quite a few systems get built on eventual consistency introducing error-prone complexity in the application dealing with it.1👍
@kumarshantanu saw your message in meetup, I just joined the slack