boot-dev

Boot development discussion and banter
martinklepsch 2017-12-19T11:11:20.000159Z

suggestions for a SNAPSHOT version number with the Pomegranate change above? πŸ”Ί 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT πŸ”Έ 2.7.3-SNAPSHOT

πŸ”Έ 1
πŸ”Ί 4
flyboarder 2017-12-19T18:43:50.000489Z

^ can we get a consensus on how boot should handle symlinks?

richiardiandrea 2017-12-19T21:02:11.000245Z

Probably 2.8.0 is better, I even think we should get a 3 just to make clear that we bumped pomegranade

richiardiandrea 2017-12-19T21:02:31.000205Z

@flyboarder I have never run into that, how to test it?

flyboarder 2017-12-19T21:04:01.000690Z

@richiardiandrea im no longer running into this issue, however if you place a symlink within a boot/tmpdir! and add-resource with that directory you should see the issue, basically the symlink was being turned into a corrupt file

flyboarder 2017-12-19T21:04:19.000100Z

but this might be resolved already

martinklepsch 2017-12-19T22:42:22.000368Z

@alandipert hey, can you add me to the boot group on Clojars? πŸ™‚

martinklepsch 2017-12-19T22:44:13.000069Z

Well, defensive seems good. We just need something that we can consistently follow. If we decide fresh everytime that probably won’t be very consistent πŸ˜›

richiardiandrea 2017-12-19T22:47:19.000398Z

Agree totally with you first point, I feel that bumping the dep resolution is a strong motivator...but then let's agree of what it is and what not...I guess πŸ˜„