clara

http://www.clara-rules.org/
ethanc 2020-08-07T14:07:52.286900Z

Thats an interesting scenario, i will have to look into whats going on there

2020-08-07T14:29:08.289100Z

@eraserhd yes, :not is already “not exist”

2020-08-07T14:29:15.289300Z

I don’t think you can nest these thing either

2020-08-07T14:29:21.289600Z

even though the syntax may not check against it

2020-08-07T14:29:24.289800Z

It is a known issue: https://github.com/cerner/clara-rules/issues/329 As you say though, while [:not [:exists A]] makes logical sense and IMO would ideally work the problem is easily avoided as you wrote.

2😮