Clojurians Log v2

the https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/issues/206 looks hard for someone who haven't used clojars, maven or pom files, great i'll try to do it

yeah, it might indeed be a little hard, probably the hardest of the three issues I listed

good opportunity for me to learn hhhh

coincidentally @dominicm just wrote an article about publishing deps.edn based projects as jars. https://juxt.pro/blog/posts/pack-maven.html

ah that's good, problem solved i guess

well... 😄 I'm not really happy with all this pom.xml fiddling that's required for this

But it is a start

oh i guess i have questions more than answers

ok so let me ask about this clj -m something.publish --project cljdoc --version 0.1.0

sure, ask away 🙂

sure, ask away 🙂

do you want a namespace named publish that publishes any project with any version ?

😅 that's what i understood of that

that specific namespace was more of a placeholder 😄

I'll add another comment to the issue with more detail

hhhh i see :thumbsup:

alright hope this makes some more sense: https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/issues/206#issuecomment-442145088

this work issue requires work on some more general Clojure tooling projects

It's an interesting thing to work on and learn about but it might also not be very beginner friendly if you're not familiar with Maven

nice: https://cljdoc.org/d/org.clojars.elarouss/cljdoc/0.1.0/doc/readme 😄

hhhh yeah i followed the tutorial

i'm just wondering if we can use this function from clojure/tools.deps.alpha, but it doesn't feel safe

which function are you thinking of?

from namespace clojure.tools.deps.alpha.gen.pom

`(sync-pom (r/read-deps [(jio/file "/usr/local/Cellar/clojure/1.9.0.302/deps.edn") (jio/file "deps.edn")]) (jio/file "."))`

it works

yeah, I think that's what clj -Spom does as well

the issue with that is that we need to manually update the generated pom.xml

omg i've just realized that deps.edn files don't contain : artifact, group ...

ah i'm sorry, i feel like i'm wasting your time and energy

Fwiw, that namespace might be removed in the future. I think it is internal.

@ichigo no worries this stuff can be confusing

yeah i guess so