cljdoc

https://cljdoc.org/ & https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc
martinklepsch 2019-08-14T11:40:39.115800Z

Welcome @nuggetsgalore ๐Ÿ‘‹

martinklepsch 2019-08-14T11:40:48.116Z

and also welcome @raydelalonsobaryolo ๐Ÿ™‚

raydel95 2019-08-14T13:08:24.116300Z

Hello ๐Ÿ‘‹

lread 2019-08-14T18:51:47.119600Z

@martinklepsch, I was starting to use cljdoc fork/branch of codox for my own purposes - to do a sanity test compare of apis for rewrite-cljs vs rewrite-clj vs rewrite-cljc. Andโ€ฆ I think I now see what you were talking about way back when I did that PR for cljs import-vars support. It is kind of annoying to have all that post-processing work in the cljdoc analysis runner. Do you remember if that was your main thought?

lread 2019-08-14T19:22:21.123Z

I donโ€™t think it would be too much work to extract cldoc codox to a new project that focused on returning resolved metadata (ie import-vars tricks included). It might also be useful for others. But what do call this project? honest-api? nolie-metadata? nolie-api? metaveritas?