Clojurians Log v2

@miikka good morning, nice to see the sourcehut thing in production 🙂 what do you think about stripping the leading ~ from the username in the SCM link text? Since it’s not something users choose I feel it’s non-essential and almost like a detail related to sourcehut that isn’t very relevant

:man-shrugging: I thought about it and decided to keep it since sourcehut keeps it everywhere, but if you feel like removing it is better, that's fine by me

Hi there

Hi @timo!

Is it possible to configure cljdoc? I need to avoid cljs analysis on cljc files in my project

it throws errors and I need to postpone that

We don’t currently have a way to tell cljdoc to ignore cljs files.

Are the throws due to something cljdoc might be doing wrong?

I am not certain, but the error might be on my side and it errors still if I put ^:no-doc on top

We can hardcode an exception if it’s not something that can be fixed on the side of the lib

Does the file work with the Clojure script Compiler otherwise?

we are working on cljs-compat right now so it might be broken for cljs currently, but that's beyond me

it's datahike

https://cljdoc.org/d/io.replikativ/datahike/0.3.2/doc/readme

I would like to add only the api-ns

so I add no-doc everywhere and released a snapshot

https://cljdoc.org/d/timokramer/datahike/0.3.5-SNAPSHOT/doc/readme

no-doc just controls what parts of your api get exposed. Cljdoc will still load your entire project.

Yeah, and if a namespace required by the api ns can’t be loaded then that will also cause the api ns to fail to load

I wonder… have you thought about maybe keeping cljs work in a branch until it is ready for release?

Or does that not work?

Yeah I guess not. If you have cljc files. You are clj ready but not cljs ready… hmm…

yeah right

Personally, I think I’d just push through and get cljs side working before release. But that’s me. And maybe not what works for you?

as it comes from datascript mostly it was working once

that's actually not what I am working on

and I think it is a lot of work

so I just want to add the api-ns as docs

but I can find another way

thanks anyway

I think both arguments are valid. (How helpful of me! :simple_smile:). We are linking to sourcehut and that’s the syntax they use for a repo. We are linking from cljdoc and its not the syntax it has used for all other repos.

I admit it does look a bit weird

On coin toss things like this, I usually just go with what @martinklepsch prefers. :simple_smile:

We can totally hardcode it if it makes your life easier, there’s a file that explicitly supports this kind of hard coding so it wouldn’t have any extra maintenance overhead

ok perfect. that would be cool for now. it will take a few weeks until clojurescript is restored I guess.

the hardcoding works based on group/artifact ID — which ones should cljs get disabled for?

io.replikativ/datahike

Is there an issue to track cljs compatibility?

https://github.com/replikativ/datahike/issues/206

Fwiw, in the future there will be a syntax for groups which differs

~ for users and something else like + for groups. So it's useful in a sense for distinguishing.