Clojurians Log v2

@otfrom Alright, I’ll bite. No, what do you mean?……

morning

@otfrom You’re not referring to my Tess Daly cosplay costume, I thought we agreed you were never going to mention that 🙂

good morning!

@jasonbell https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2020-09-02/jason-bell-strictly-come-dancing-2020-contestant/

Morning

Wooohooo @jasonbell on Strictly!!!! I'll vote for that!

morning btw

@otfrom I am aware of him, but was not aware that he’s in the UK making an idiot of himself.

that is your job? isn't it?

@thomas you may well be wasting your money.

it would be a good cause!

Two left feet….. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC_PACr5cT8

Morning

late morning

morning

howdy

fun Friday subject ... who thinks clojure.string/starts-with? which takes two args: s substr has those args in the right order? I don't know but I always get it wrong. So maybe I do know.

that is the correct way around as it is like all the other things that go nicely with ->

I read it as "does s start with substr"

I think my only annoyance with the -> friendly functions is that they don't play well with partial, and I like partial

(partial to partial?)

very partial

personally, not sure that -> should drive all API design

positional args are deprecated man

is that what clj-kondo reports these days?

don't tempt me

-> ->> and transducers would like to disagree

@otfrom if everyone conformed to map in and map out we would only need -> and not ->> or confusing combinations thereof ;)

I'm only half joking, using maps for every function call would probably be costly

😃

map in/out everywhere leads to global state, just in a map instead of at the ns-level. That's only barely better than global state.

I assume it was a joke, who would do it for real?

Goodnight

(defn is-borkdudes-idea-sane? ([] (is-borkdudes-idea-sane? {})) ([{:keys [sane?] :or {sane? true}}] sane?)) => #'user/is-borkdudes-idea-sane? (is-borkdudes-idea-sane?) => true