๐
Morning! โ๏ธ
Morning
Hi there! @pez Your :clojureD 2021 talk is online! https://youtube.com/watch?v=NIk5hVzA_fY ๐ป
Morning. Wow!
There goes my morning ๐
Haha, you are a super hero in that story, Erik! (Because it is a story about Calva.) โค๏ธ
Yes! Next time I need to (sort brain)
, I know where to reach out. ๐
Wow, not sure how to put it, but I never realized that what from my side was, as you put it, basically acting as a rubber duck, was so important (and dare I say fruitful) for you. There is definitively an important/interesting asymmetry here, as the effort I put in was negligible for me, but the output was obviously important for you ๐
Anyways, I really love your vision for Calva, and the work you put in to make Clojure accessible for beginners is both super impressive and very important.
Remember, when I first was made aware of Calva, it had the capability of freezing all bash-terminals. Today itโs a no-brainer to recommend it as an editor for any Clojure programmer. Well done!
(and, nice and well delivered talk!)
It was even more important to me than I allowed myself to say in that talk. Thanks!
Morning
Good Morning Fellow Clojurists!
Gd mrnng
Hlp hv lst ll vwls n m kybrd
Good morning!
o oie i a e ou ou
Morning! Is there somebody in the channel whose (european) company sponsors projects / maintainers on GitHub? Iโm wondering about things like VAT, taxes etc. etc. and cannot find anything online.
I recall seeing someone on twitter saying that they stopped using GitHub sponsors, because it didnโt handle those things properly. They may have been wrong/overly scrupulous/out of date, though
As far as I see it, the sponsoring fees are part of the monthly GitHub bill. As long as GitHub creates valid invoices, this should work tax-wise. Guess I wonโt be able to deduct the donations from taxes, but thatโs not that importantโฆ
morning
Morning
Good morning ๐
Didnโt know you were in here too, vvvalvalval (is that right?)
Morning! French it is
๐
Is that a Polish name?
Valentin = French (or Belgian?)
good afternoon :male_zombie:
what are some publicly accessible code bases you find particularly elegant ?
The VS Code team is tougher to convince they have a bug than the Java team is. ๐ Please upvote this on Github, folks: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/126306
Morning, vote for the VScode issue done.
@fahd.elmazouni look at pretty much anything from @weavejester
consider this function
(defn split? [hand]
(and (= 2 (count (vals hand)))
(apply = (map :rank (vals hand)))))
we could also write
(defn split? [hand]
(let [vs (vals hand)]
(and (= 2 (count vs)) (apply = (map :rank vs)))))
wouldn't this be nicer...
(defn split? [{:apply vals :as vs}]
(and (= 2 (count vs)) (apply = (map :rank vs))))
has something where we can use functions in destructuring ever been put on the table?
Hot take: particularly elegant code is code waiting for production to happen.
๐ ๐ฅ
ooh me peach hurts after that one