Clojurians Log v2

> datahike/java/IEntity has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 57.0), this version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 55.0 I’m at openjdk@11 o_O

do i actually need jdk 13 to run datahike?

I would LOVE to have access from Bababshka 🙂

@laheadle I am also using org-roam and have thought about proposing Datahike to its author. Can you reach out to him and maybe he is interested? We have GraalVM on the agenda, but it has not top priority yet. Last time I tried the compilation ran forever, I am not sure why. It might be related to our core.async usage, or, as @borkdude suggested, the filestore backend, although that would be bad for the GraalVM if it cannot compile Java's filesystem IO. If you like to break it down by gradually compiling konserve, hitchhiker-tree and Datahike with GraalVM, we are willing to help of course. An alternative is to use our new REST API and have a local instance running, that should work right away and the interface would be similar to the one of the GraalVM binary.

No, this was a mistake during the release procedure and is resolved in a SNAPSHOT built https://github.com/replikativ/datahike/issues/165

So this would be a way to get quickly started.

a datahike babashka pod would be awesome, similar to https://github.com/babashka/babashka-sql-pods

@grischoun thanks for this excellent article: https://lambdaforge.io/2020/05/25/java-api.html

@timok Thanks! Were things unclear or left open? We have got some good feedback here and tried to clarify: https://www.reddit.com/r/java/comments/gqtxg7/how_to_use_datahikes_java_api_to_build_a_web/. We still need to put this into an FAQ for Java developers.

I just enjoyed reading it and had the feeling that I could start a SpringBoot project right away but I am not a Java dev so am probably not the right one to find any shortcomings.