Clojurians Log v2
Clojure programming
Channels
Apps
datomic
Ask questions on the official Q&A site at https://ask.datomic.com!
mikejcusack 2021-03-02T00:41:36.056400Z
The latter option isn't using history.
em 2021-03-02T02:37:29.056600Z
In the context of a more event-sourced model the former can make a lot of sense with multiple streams, out-of-sync arrivals, various sources of truth etc. but in this case I think the tx-function approach is totally fine. Especially considering that the scale seems small, and Datomic having single global write transactor. Then again if the scale is small enough reducing on every lookup might not be that expensive either.
mikejcusack 2021-03-02T02:46:28.056800Z
That's about what I was thinking. I don't think the scale would be large enough for reducing to be a problem. Especially since the query would filter down to the relevant transactions first.
steveb8n 2021-03-02T03:46:42.058200Z
Q: the on-prem api supported running datalog queries against regular vectors/maps (instead of the db). 1/ where are those samples? 2/ is this also possible using the client/cloud API?
2021-03-02T18:49:21.062900Z
In peer you can supply a vector of vectors. You can’t in client
steveb8n 2021-03-03T22:35:01.078900Z
thanks. I thought that was the case. shame but core.match will work too
steveb8n 2021-03-02T03:47:18.058300Z
background: I need a matching api and I’d like to try using datalog instead of core.match
henrik 2021-03-02T07:47:27.059400Z
Is there a way to parameterize the pull expression when used in a query? I.e, something like
{:find [(pull ?item ?pull-fields)] … }
tatut 2021-03-02T09:20:52.060100Z
you can have patterns as :in parameters without the ?
henrik 2021-03-02T10:23:27.060300Z
So I can, thank you. So the ? is magic, I just thought it was a part of the symbol name.
jaret 2021-03-02T18:54:26.063200Z