eastwood

All things realted to eastwood - the Clojure linter
2018-09-15T00:00:50.000100Z

Such a feature is likely to be one of the top annoyances of people who have tried, but then given up, using Eastwood, for lack of such a feature.

2018-09-15T02:16:59.000100Z

@andy.fingerhut what thoughts are those ๐Ÿ˜‰ edit: I filed an issue if you'd like to chime in there (incase slack messages disappear): https://github.com/jonase/eastwood/issues/282

2018-09-15T06:18:39.000100Z

I can add a comment on that issue.

๐Ÿ‘ 1
slipset 2018-09-15T10:00:37.000100Z

@noisesmith an issue would be appreciated, and a PR even more so ๐Ÿ™‚

slipset 2018-09-15T10:03:07.000100Z

Iโ€™ve done a simple work around for the deprecated linter, in which the config takes a set of regular expressions to match on vars you donโ€™t care about being deprecated.

slipset 2018-09-15T10:03:57.000100Z

This approach โ€œworksโ€ for any linter that works on vars, but does not offer the granularity of expressions/forms

slipset 2018-09-15T10:04:46.000100Z

Also, a downside to this approach is that itโ€™s done in the config and not in the code

slipset 2018-09-15T10:06:30.000100Z

For vars I guess one could imagine using meta-data (which obviously has been discussed before), but we might also have to acknowledge that different linters need different approaches to disable warnings.

2018-09-15T22:45:44.000100Z

I added some comments to that issue linked above. Feel free to ask questions in comments there, or here. There is more than one way to do it, of course -- the note there is just what I was considering implementing.

2018-09-17T18:13:50.000100Z

Thanks, I think that context helps ๐Ÿ™‚ might try to take a stab... sometime