functionalprogramming

bostonaholic 2016-07-05T14:55:02.000004Z

working with the admins to fix my typo of the channel name

bostonaholic 2016-07-05T15:22:05.000011Z

👋

seancorfield 2016-07-05T15:23:40.000012Z

You hit the 21 character channel name limit?

bostonaholic 2016-07-05T15:23:47.000013Z

yuuuuup

bostonaholic 2016-07-05T15:24:02.000014Z

and #fp is already taken?

bostonaholic 2016-07-05T15:24:08.000015Z

but I don’t see it in the channel list

seancorfield 2016-07-05T15:33:48.000019Z

@fp is taken as a user name but #fp as a channel name looks available.

bostonaholic 2016-07-05T15:40:58.000020Z

slack is telling me otherwise

bostonaholic 2016-07-05T15:42:18.000021Z

it could also be that it’s a private channel?

seancorfield 2016-07-05T16:47:40.000022Z

Based on my tests, you cannot create a channel with the same name as a person (username). Interesting restriction.

seancorfield 2016-07-05T16:48:09.000023Z

So… FP… what are folks’ histories around FP? How long? First FP language?

lewix 2016-07-05T17:58:52.000024Z

People have been telling me that I write javascript in a very functional way so I started looking at functional languages and found clojure

lewix 2016-07-05T17:59:29.000025Z

I don't believe that clojurescript/reagent would make me more productive than react/redux though

seancorfield 2016-07-05T18:09:27.000026Z

I suspect it would once you’d ramped up on cljs — React code looks very verbose to me, compared to what I’ve built with Reagent, but React is much more familiar to folks with an OOP background… and of course it’s easy to find JS developers (although not necessary easy to find good JS developers).

seancorfield 2016-07-05T18:09:56.000028Z

I think it’s very interesting to see the increased focus on FP style idioms in the JS world tho’...

lewix 2016-07-05T18:11:02.000029Z

I tried reagent, reframe and hoplon