garden

noprompt 2016-12-07T18:40:47.000021Z

@michael.heuberger there isn’t now but there will be a function in garden.core called vdom-style which produces a javascript object. you’ll be able to write [:elem {:style (garden.core/vdom-style {,,,})] and that will work as you’d expect.

noprompt 2016-12-07T18:42:43.000022Z

within the next week or so there should be an alpha of the next major version of garden available. there are some small and significant breaking changes on the horizon so please consult this changelog 👉 https://github.com/noprompt/garden/blob/v2.0.0/ChangeLog.md for details.

noprompt 2016-12-07T18:43:19.000024Z

please share any concerns or questions with me on the pull request for the next major version here: https://github.com/noprompt/garden/pull/123

noprompt 2016-12-07T18:43:32.000026Z

i’m also open to any questions here as well.

noprompt 2016-12-07T18:50:15.000027Z

@meeli that post is fantastic! thank you for sharing. i think it captures the rational and benefit of using something like garden far better than anything i could have come up with!

👍 1
noprompt 2016-12-07T18:53:08.000028Z

garden v2 will actually have a pretty good answer for something like PostCSS because garden now works with an AST under the hood. instead of compiling CSS directly from objects, garden v2 has a parse phase which produces a CSS AST and that is compiled. what this means is that you can do AST transforms on the CSS before it’s compiled.

noprompt 2016-12-07T18:56:17.000029Z

so basically, garden v2 comes with PostCSS baked in since there’s an AST and that can be manipulated using the clojure toolbox.

😍 1
noprompt 2016-12-07T18:57:34.000030Z

the other really, really cool thing that comes out of this is that we now have a way of going from CSS back to garden — it enables unparsing.

😍 2
noprompt 2016-12-07T18:59:24.000031Z

what i love most about this property is that existing CSS could be parsed into an AST and then transformed back into clojure data structures and garden’s records.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:00:12.000032Z

the vast majority of it is based on multimethods too which gives the library consumer much more control than was previously available.

niamu 2016-12-07T19:03:09.000033Z

@noprompt That is incredibly exciting!

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:04:45.000034Z

@niamu i think the most exciting part, for me anyway, is all the issues that will finally be closed! 😛

niamu 2016-12-07T19:06:05.000035Z

Garden is probably one of my favourite libraries to show non-Clojure people. SASS never felt right to me and Garden is the perfect thing to point to that explains why.

❤️ 1
shaun-mahood 2016-12-07T19:06:22.000036Z

@noprompt: Closed as in fixed? Or closed as in "new version, so let's forget about the old issues so we have room for new ones?" 🙂 I'm excited for either option, really.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:07:45.000037Z

@shaun-mahood literally fixed. 🙂

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:08:38.000038Z

#31, #52, #109, #115, #116, #119, #120, #121 are fixed.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:09:33.000039Z

my hope is that the new design will make it a) easier for me to turn around bug fixes and/or b) make it easier for others to submit patches.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:10:30.000040Z

what’s on master is a clear reflection of my inexperience when i started putting it together. hopefully, what exists on 2.0.0 will reflect a much more careful and thought out design.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:12:33.000041Z

with the exception of a couple complex scenarios the compiler namespace should be fairly easy to comprehend by an intermediate clojure developer.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:14:53.000042Z

the normalize namespace harbors most of the complexity and needs some explanation to make it a bit more clear but the nice thing is that responsibilities it has are no longer interleaved within the compiler.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:15:34.000043Z

clojure.spec has been a huge when too.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:17:40.000044Z

@meeli this is a nice example of how by having clojure something like modular scale can be handrolled in a matter of minutes.

(defn ms-scale-up [base-font-size ratio i]
  {:pre [(nat-int? i)]}
  (reduce
   (fn [n _] (+ n (* ratio n)))
   base-font-size
   (range 0 i)))

(defn ms-scale-down [base-font-size ratio i]
  {:pre [(nat-int? i)]}
  (reduce
   (fn [n _] (/ n ratio))
   base-font-size
   (range 0 i)))

(defn modular-scale
  ([base-font-size ratio]
   (fn [i]
     {:pre [(integer? i)]}
     (cond
       (pos? i)
       (ms-scale-up base-font-size ratio i)

       (neg? i)
       (ms-scale-down base-font-size ratio (- i))
       
       (zero? i)
       base-font-size)))
  ([base-font-size ratio f]
   (let [g (modular-scale base-font-size ratio)]
     (fn [i]
       {:pre [(integer? i)]}
       (f (g i))))))

❤️ 1
noprompt 2016-12-07T19:19:30.000045Z

(def mspx
  (modular-scale 14 1.125 garden.units/px))

[(mspx -1)
 (mspx 0)
 (mspx 1)]
;; =>
[#garden.units.Unit{:magnitude 12.444444444444445, :measurement :px}
 <#C0FQERS0H|garden>.units.Unit{:magnitude 14, :measurement :px}
 <#C0FQERS0H|garden>.units.Unit{:magnitude 29.75, :measurement :px}]

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:20:39.000046Z

it’d be interesting to see an implementation of something equivalent to sassline.

shaun-mahood 2016-12-07T19:30:49.000047Z

@noprompt: I've seriously been looking forward to this, thanks for putting all this work in. I'm going to be starting to replace all of my existing SASS and CSS with Garden and get everything styled consistently over the next month or 2, so I should be able to spend a good amount of time with the new version soon. I used garden for all the styles in my Conj talk and it made some of the last minute changes and fixes a lot less stressful, so you get double thanks 🙂

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:34:16.000048Z

@shaun-mahood nice! i think the only thing that’s keeping it from being the primary branch at this point is integrating the selectors namespace with parse, a tweak to garden.core/vdom-style, and bug fix for keyframes rendering.

noprompt 2016-12-07T19:36:02.000049Z

do have a look at the Changelog though. the selector syntax for rules has changed slightly but it’s slight enough to incompatible with the v1 selector syntax.

2016-12-07T21:03:32.000050Z

@noprompt cool, thanks for that