Clojurians Log v2

@lilactown Do you advise some integration with css-in-js like $ ? Material-ui for example, it bundles a js-in-css solution https://gist.github.com/geraldodev/a9b60dd611d1628f9413dd6de6c3c974#file-material_ui_helix-cljs-L14 . It avoids global css which is a good thing.

I'm playing with Helix and React Native, I'm trying to understand the error here:

(apply $ rn/View {:style #js {:flex 1 :alignItems "center" :justifyContent "center"}}
      [(rnc/text {:style #js {:fontSize 36}} "Hello Helix!")
       (rnc/button {:title "Click me"})])

the code is for experimenting purposes (trying to wrap react native stuff with factory)

but that code doesn't work, it errors with [object Object] is not ISeqable

the stack from RN is quite incomplete, so not sure, I was using the apply $ to isolate the constructor

when I use createElement directly from React it works fine

digging a bit, the problem is happening during -native-props call

doing this (apply helix.core/$ rn/Text {:style #js {:flex 1}} ["Hello" "World"]) works for me so I imagine the error has to do with the component children

@alidcastano I ran a couple of experiments to test that, but in the end, when I kept the props clean, it failed, when used the :style, it broke

was specifically problem with rn/View from React Native from MacOS, and I can see a difference, the View is a string component (native component), the others are not

so I'm guessing the issue is with the fn version of $ when used with native elements

you can break any with: (apply $ "div" {:style #js {:flex 1}} ["child"])

actually, I'm writing an issue, but as I test more (not on RN now, just on regular react on browser) I see it breaks with this: ($ "div" {:style #js {:flex 1}})

you might want to pass ^:native to $ that might fix it

@alidcastano I figured a different problem, not really an issue per se, but a confusing situation

but this looks to still be a bug

I described that in: https://github.com/Lokeh/helix/issues/61

@wilkerlucio is there a particular reason you’re passing in styles as a JS object instead of a map?

the trick part is because its not clear with RN components are native and which are not

and that may vary depending on which RN impl its being targetted (mac os RN may have different settings than Windows, than ios, etc... and those can change over time)

the idea is that if you’re using $ then you should be able to just passing in maps

so I’m not sure yet why you’d want to literally pass in a JS obj yet

for example, Button in RN for MacOS is not a native component

what do you mean by “native” exactly?

the same thing you mean in helix when you check for native when running $

if its a string or keyword

or if its a component

okay, it’s a bit of a leaky thing beyond react-dom so that’s why i’m asking

gotcha

yeah, so using the js-obj could be the safe version for incosistent situations like this

yeah there’s a couple ways to handle this, at the application level and at the library (helix level)

one thing you can do is annotate the Button symbol with ^:native

e.g. ($ ^:native rn/Button {:style {:flex 1}})

but then I have to know which component is which (native or not)

if I could just throw #js in all of then, I can avoid caring about it

also, I fear changes between versions, a non-native component today may be turned native on the next version

the “native” classification is not really useful beyond react-dom

I regret adding it tbh

the only thing that really matters is whether a component expects :style as a JS object or not

so all react-native components are “native” in that sense

yeah, but in impl that varies, which is the issue (which is not true for react dom)

when you use the $ macro it doesn’t really tho

($ foo) is always assumed to be non-“native”

because it’s a symbol

yeah, I only have problems when using props with :style

ah, sorry, gotcha

yeah, I got the problem because I'm wrapping the components with factory

it sounds like e.g. rn/View is actually a string?

yup

😵

that's what I mean by native 😛

I never expected that

rn/View
=> "RCTView"
rn/Text
=>
#js{"$$typeof" "Symbol(react.forward_ref)",
    :render #object[Text],
    :displayName "Text",
    :propTypes #js{:ellipsizeMode #object[bound checkType],
                   :numberOfLines #object[bound checkType],
                   :textBreakStrategy #object[bound checkType],
                   :onLayout #object[bound checkType],
                   :onPress #object[bound checkType],
                   :onLongPress #object[bound checkType],
                   :pressRetentionOffset #object[bound checkType],
                   :selectable #object[bound checkType],
                   :selectionColor #object[bound colorPropType],
                   :suppressHighlighting #object[bound checkType],
                   :style #object[Function],
                   :testID #object[bound checkType],
                   :nativeID #object[bound checkType],
                   :allowFontScaling #object[bound checkType],
                   :maxFontSizeMultiplier #object[bound checkType],
                   :accessible #object[bound checkType],
                   :adjustsFontSizeToFit #object[bound checkType],
                   :minimumFontScale #object[bound checkType],
                   :disabled #object[bound checkType],
                   :dataDetectorType #object[bound checkType]}}
rn/Button
=> #object[Button]

wild

okay

I don’t really exercise the runtime version of $ much

no worries, I'm just a new user hitting unexplored code paths 🙂

FWIW what I’d like to do is create a namespace of macros similar to helix.dom

@lilactown and you plan to also support #js style on native?

I think the macro ns may be a problem, because you can't know what to expect from the components

even though Button is not native on MacOS RN, it may be native in other impls

so we can't know for sure what each is, makes sense?

@wilkerlucio using a macro routes around this problem completely

the macro $ is completely consistent

($ ^:native rn/View {:style {flex 1}}) will always convert the :style prop to a JS object

$ checks at macro time whether the first argument is a string/keyword or a symbol

if it’s a symbol, it treats it as “non-native” unless it’s annotated with ^:native metadata

so rn/View can go from at runtime being a string, function, class, memoized, whatever, it doesn’t matter

a macro would do something like: (defmacro view [& args] `($ ^:native rn/View ~@args)) which would always be unambiguous. no matter what rn/View is at runtime, it would always have the same behavior

let’s define native to be: “a component which requires transformation of props before construction, e.g. :style prop to be a JS object, :class to be renamed to :className, etc.”

then whether or not rn/View is a string or not is irrelevant, it will always be “native”. the detection of string/keyword is just a dumb heuristic to try and get that information at compile time

the inconsistency we’re running into now is that if you apply this same heuristic at runtime, it’s even dumber, because apparently React Native has some of it’s “native” components as strings and other “native” components as functions / memoized components /etc.

so the easy answer is: don’t do this at runtime :P

but I’ll have to think more about this issue before coming up with an encompassing solution

I won’t be at a computer today, so fix will have to wait until later this week

for now, I can probably put a bandaid on it by not blowing up if you pass in a JS object

but ultimately I need to think harder on the API of $ and how it extends beyond react-dom