Clojurians Log v2

Hey. The inf-clojure repl is getting an extra prompt for each newline present in the evaluated form. For example, if I evaluate a form with 5 lines, the repl looks like this:

my.project=>               #_=>               #_=>               #_=>               #_=> nil

I’ve been using socket repls exclusively. I haven’t tested on a bare repl in a while

I’d suggest using the socket repl

Those look like the sub prompts. I think there was some code involved that would make everything a single string and strip new lines for this reason

Oh, I just realized this does not happen when I use inf-clojure-eval-last-sexp directly, rather than my own fork of lispy. My bad. (that’s weird though, as lispy will simply use inf-clojure-eval-last-sexp with call-interactivelly [1]. Anyway, will investigate). [1]: https://github.com/Andre0991/lispy-lite/blob/main/lispy.el#L4237

On the socket repl, I’d like to go to that route, yeap. But since it’s a lein project, I guess using lein repl is unavoidable, right?

You can add some jvm properties to get a socket repl

:jvm-opts
    ["-Dclojure.server.repl={:port 5555 :accept clojure.core.server/repl}"]

Oh right, I experimented with that as well. The issue is that I haven’t figured out a way of randomising the port in case I need to spin multiple repls - see https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C9BT75KRC/p1617506171010800

yeah i think that's a pain

Okay 😞

Anyways, thanks for your help

Just out of curiosity: confirmed that (call-interactivelly ’inf-clojure-eval-last-sexp) inserts the extra prompts, while inf-clojure-eval-last-sexp (actually called interactivelly by me) doesn’t. That’s so weird. Maybe something is relying on this-command. Will investigate.

Very interested

And I’ll try to run non socket versions more. Also the discord server for cider is more of the official spot for development now these days

Oh, I didn’t know about the discord server. Cool, just joined it.

By the way, just confirmed that the issue is this-command , as it has a different value when call-interactivelly is called: https://github.com/clojure-emacs/inf-clojure/blob/1e99b8246bb1fe7666d613a9ae566e2a939fc2bb/inf-clojure.el#L669 Well, its usage looks legitimate here, of course. I’ll try some workaround.

(add-hook 'comint-preoutput-filter-functions #'inf-clojure-preoutput-filter nil t)

Hummm, on second thoughts, if you are interacting with the repl buffer directly, you probably don’t want those hooks to interfere with them.

Yeah, I guess I’ll do the right thing and call the function non-interactively

Well, but if the inf-clojure command is not called interactively, the comint hook won’t filter the text, as it consults last-command. So… I dunno. Thinking in other workarounds.