I mean, you gave some tips that could have helped him to debug, and also you "... is a new contributor. Be nice ... ". So yeah, feel free to be annoyed. ๐
That's very common. My friends in the ColdFusion (CFML) community are always having their posts deleted by SO moderators who know nothing about CFML...
This is part of why we have http://ask.clojure.org now. To avoid the weird partisanship of SO.
Mmmm, I figured! Quite sad tho that it then seems to others that the Clojure community might be "dead". Especially cause of our removal from the StackOverflow survey this year (speaking of which did anyone actually find out why? ๐ฎ )
The SO survey is not a useful measure of anything, given the politics of SO...
Tiobe is also not a useful measure, because it arbitrarily decides what is a language and what isn't. The same goes for all these "language popularity" sites.
Yeap, I saw a discussion on that on reddit. I do agree it might not be useful to those who understand. But to those who aren't in the loop, people who would have potentially gotten into Clojure that doesn't help that part i guess? That's how I feel at least
But you can't go out and convince all those people, you just can't reach them. This is just one of those annoying things about misinformation. There's nothing you can do.
Mmmm, yeap that's the unfortunate reality :x
Gotta be "zen" about it... otherwise it will drive you crazy ๐
possibly fun thing to try at your clojure repl (jvm, clr, and cljs):
user=> 36ReallyIsAWeirdBaseIsItNotDoWeHaveSmallTalkToThankForThis
For those interested but lazy, a quote from https://clojure.org/guides/learn/syntax: > Clojure also supports [...] arbitrary radix (prefix with base then r) integers. Seems like character case doesn't matter.
http://mmlabsites.disi.unitn.it/face-perception A friend of mine is running this university research experiment about recognizing real faces vs deep fakes. If you have a few minutes to participate and are interested give it a go ๐
Is human memory immutable?
something something 4d spacetime so yes, human memory is immutable.
Woop, didnโt mean to spam the channel.
I like that concept
yeah, I like that too. memories are read-time constructs
I can swing the answer either way, which direction helps pay the bills?
^ word
Its the opposite of immutable
yeah i think i've read they work as reinforced paths. Accessing data makes it stronger ๐
Brain is lazy like that
exactly, and conversely paths not used often gradually degrade. then again, there are many kinds of paths with varying characteristics (e.g. motor skills vs. memory of historical facts), and I think paths created in different circumstances (e.g. at different ages) can have different characteristics (e.g. a very old memory that is almost never accessed but doesnโt degrade much).
I'm not an expert but I highly doubt that based on the limited knowledge I have on the matter.
I thought I knew, but I've forgotten
It is not, our memories are rewritten every time they are recalled.