om

Please ask the channel first, not @dnolen directly!
claudiu 2017-05-26T12:00:33.374846Z

Hi. Is anybody using om-next with datascript ? Trying to figure out if it’s worth the learning curve & if there are downsides to using it instead of an atom.

2017-05-26T12:15:45.547832Z

The downside (if you consider it one) is that set-query! won't work and you'll have to implement your own merge function (if dealing with a remote).

staypufd 2017-05-26T17:22:14.371978Z

Is Om-Next close to release yet?

dehli 2017-05-26T18:04:11.190297Z

it’s still in alpha, but i think it’s pretty close to a beta release. let me find the message

dehli 2017-05-26T18:06:45.241566Z

nvm, slack doesn’t have history

👍 1
dehli 2017-05-26T18:06:53.243917Z

well since it’s a free plan

2017-05-26T18:29:20.675280Z

When i transact how does om know what rerenders to schedule?

2017-05-26T18:30:55.706306Z

Is it cuz mutations say the queries affected in :keys

dnolen 2017-05-26T18:30:59.707653Z

gonna try to find time today to cut beta release

👍 8
💯 4
😮 6
anmonteiro 2017-05-26T18:33:03.746302Z

@dnolen gonna upgrade React in master before that, sounds good?

dnolen 2017-05-26T18:33:14.749729Z

@anmonteiro sounds great

anmonteiro 2017-05-26T18:33:17.750787Z

awesome

dnolen 2017-05-26T18:38:51.853554Z

I’ve just created an om-cljs Google Group https://groups.google.com/d/forum/om-cljs

dnolen 2017-05-26T18:39:19.861519Z

nothing to see there yet, but it’ll be nice to have a place for discussion outside of Slack

🙂 6
anmonteiro 2017-05-26T18:46:02.981645Z

just bumped some deps in master, most importantly React to 15.5.4

dnolen 2017-05-26T18:46:29.989624Z

thanks

staypufd 2017-05-26T20:52:40.974944Z

Many people will be excited about Beta arrival. Thanks to whole team who've made Om and Om-Next such great tools to help us make great software.

staypufd 2017-05-26T20:54:22.998108Z

And a special Thx to David for his original idea and then not settling on good enough. Your stewardship has helped us all.

2017-05-26T21:02:25.109889Z

😄

dnolen 2017-05-26T21:04:49.142892Z

@staypufd thanks!

dnolen 2017-05-26T21:05:20.149721Z

will be making time to be a better steward of this project in the coming months 🙂

dnolen 2017-05-26T21:05:46.155388Z

README will be overhauled, and I think we should take the same strategy as Clojure(Script) for docs, sans the CA requirement for docs

dnolen 2017-05-26T21:06:17.162103Z

by docs, I mean a proper static site via AsciiDocs

dnolen 2017-05-26T21:06:48.169088Z

also would like to see if people want to just jump to ClojureScript 1.9.X

dnolen 2017-05-26T21:07:21.176109Z

then we could use spec for the query and get a lot of validation power

👍 13
anmonteiro 2017-05-26T21:08:08.186322Z

I’d particularly like to see what you had in mind for the error stuff

dnolen 2017-05-26T21:08:31.191662Z

@anmonteiro yeah will have to come later, needs more hammock 🙂

☑️ 1
dnolen 2017-05-26T21:38:46.548248Z

just cut 1.0.0-beta1, not going to make a big hub-bub about it yet 🙂 Need to release ClojureScript today

🎉 16
dnolen 2017-05-26T21:38:58.550389Z

will work on some docs over the holiday and probably announce something early next week