while looking through the source, I saw special handling for :<>
and :*
for the tag in the markup, basically expanding into a fragment
. Is that legacy behavior and you should be using fragment
instead or why is that not documented?
Anecdotally I've come across a couple instances where a rum/fragment
works but the equivalent shorthand [:<>]
does not (created some runtime exception). I was in a bit of a rush so didn't figure out a minimal reproducible example. I'll try to do so next time I come across it
In the meantime, are you aware of any situations where [:<>]
is problematic?
prefer :<> over other methods
would you want me to add a PR to add this to the docs? It's not yet documented, if I've looked correctly