When compiling an application including test.check in CLJS 1.10.597
I see this warning:
WARNING: cljs.core/<=, all arguments must be numbers, got [#{nil js/Number} number] instead at line 999 target/cljsbuild-compiler-2/clojure/test/check/generators.cljc
googling that message shows me that it's been appearing in people's stack traces for years, but I couldn't find any discussion about that warning in particular on the slack archives or on JIRA.
If anyone remembers prior discussion about this message would you mind pointing me to it or summarizing? Thanks.I've never heard of it
What test.check version are you using?
I believe 1.0.0. This is all part of a big application, I think I'll try to recreate a minimal example
That's not a version
oh, one sec
https://github.com/clojure/test.check/blob/master/CHANGELOG.markdown ?
Woah
lol, I'm bringing all the news today
I guess Alex released it
Okay well anyhow
Line 999 doesn't have a <= call
So I have no idea what it might be referring to
That line just defs a number to be the negation of another
I'd ask in #cljs
the difference in line numbers might be because of cljc
but this is the line that 999 points to in my target
directory: https://github.com/clojure/test.check/blob/master/src/main/clojure/clojure/test/check/generators.cljc#L1193
cljc
causes different line numbers?
Yeah that's news to me
it shouldn't, and whether it does is a verifiable assertion
(i know you qualified it with "might" @adamfrey )
yeah, sorry, I threw that out there as an guess
surprise!
Looking at the code it's pretty obvious via human analysis that the args can't be nil
If those cljs warnings have false positives, maybe they have a way to suppress them?
Adding to the false positives likelihood I found a recent message of a similar vein: https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C07UQ678E/p1587734805230700
I don't know what cljs wants us to do 🙂
so maybe this is a #cljs-dev question rather than #test-check
Yeah
At least initially
Thanks for your help, Gary and Ghadi.
the difference in line numbers looks like it's because I'm not actually getting 1.0.0
, but an older version in my compilation output even though 1.0.0
is in my project.clj
. I'll figure that part out. Sorry for the wild speculation, ha