Between ctrl-p, clap, and fzf, Iβve found fzf to be the fastest out of the box, and with nice βDWIMβ behaviour (clap was also good there).
I also tend to favor plugins that donβt define mappings. Commands compose much better π
No no. Mappings compose better. Dependent on the mapping.
Operators / text objects > Commands π I don't think there's a useful heuristic of mappings and composition. However, I agree this buffer listing should be user choice.
I've been using clap for months and I'm fairly happy with it but I'm considering going back to fzf+rg. I've had a few issues on a shared host we use at work where the "maple" binary that clap uses runs off taking up 100% CPU. I've also had issues where I close part of it's fancy clever floating window interface which essentially bricks my nvim until I go in and either kill the windows through commands or restart it. I'd rather use something a little simpler (and was even considering writing my own pluggable one based on Aniseed+Fennel/Lua π¬)
I think I'll have to give fzf another go!
Yeah operators and text objects are something I need to dig further into. Turns out they have added a few new ones and the ability to define your own in the past years. I hate the vim-sexp mappings (and the tim Pope ones)
I would consider writing paredit in aniseed/fennel, but I donβt have time :)
The sexp ones are wonderful. Don't hate them.
@olical I just had a look at Conjure, starting from the GitHub page, did the Conjure tutorial (http://conjure.fun/school), and by Odin's beard, is it polished! Really great work! π I'm switching immediately π
π± that's wonderful to hear, I hope you like it. Please do get in touch if you hit any issues. I've been on holiday mode for a week or so but fixes and improvements should continue to flow soon. (#conjure or https://conjure.fun/discord for more Conjure specific stuff π)
Hrm, I have to try more π